Is there such a thing as gambling dual disorder? Preliminary evidence and clinical profiles.

Patients with gambling disorder (GD) frequently present other mental disorders, such as substance use disorder (SUDs), attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), mood disorders, and impulse-control disorders. We propose that GD should not be conceptualized as a single nosological entity, but rather as a gambling dual disorder (GDD). This study aims to provide further evidence of the co-occurrence of GD and other mental disorders in routine clinical practice and to identify different clinical profiles of severity. This descriptive, cross-sectional, and observational study included 116 patients with GD who were undergoing treatment in a specialized center. The MULTICAGE-CAD 4 and South Oaks gambling screen questionnaires confirmed the presence of GD in 97.4% and 100% of the patients, respectively. Other addictive behaviors such as compulsive spending, Internet, video games, or SUD (59.5%, 27.6%, 11.2%, and 13.8%, respectively) were also identified. The most used substances were tobacco (42.2%) and alcohol (5.2%). Half of the patients suffered from ADHD, 30.2% showed moderate or severe depression, and 17.2% suffered from a social anxiety problem. The majority (76.7%) also presented a phenotype with high impulsiveness. The cluster analysis identified two different clinical profiles of severity in patients with GDD. One profile showed higher severity of other mental disorders (ADHD, depression, anxiety, SUD, or insomnia), impulsivity, general psychopathological burden, and disability. In conclusion, our study provides further evidence on the co-occurrence of GD and other mental disorders supporting the GDD existence, shows impulsiveness as a vulnerability factor for GD, and identifies two clinical severity profiles.

Addictive and other mental disorders: a call for a standardized definition of dual disorders.

The persistent difficulty in conceptualizing the relationship between addictive and other mental disorders stands out among the many challenges faced by the field of Psychiatry. The different philosophies and schools of thought about, and the sheer complexity of these highly prevalent clinical conditions make progress inherently difficult, not to mention the profusion of competing and sometimes contradictory terms that unnecessarily exacerbate the challenge. The lack of a standardized term adds confusion, fuels stigma, and contributes to a "wrong door syndrome" that captures the difficulty of not only diagnosing but also treating addictive and other mental disorders in an integrated manner. The World Association on Dual Disorders (WADD) proposes the adoption of the term "Dual Disorder" which, while still arbitrary, would help harmonize various clinical and research efforts by rallying around a single, more accurate, and less stigmatizing designation.

A Feasibility Study of Patients with Major Depression and Substance Use Disorders: Vortioxetine as Maintenance Treatment.

Background: Limited studies have evaluated the effectiveness of vortioxetine in real-world settings, and none of them has involved patients with dual depression (major depressive disorder [MDD] and substance use disorder [SUD]). The objective of the study was to describe the effectiveness of vortioxetine in clinical practice and determine its effect on affective symptoms, cognitive function, quality of life, and substance use in patients with MDD and SUD. Methods: Post-authorization, retrospective, multicenter, descriptive, and observational study in 80 patients with MDD and SUD receiving a maintenance treatment with vortioxetine for six months between January 2017 and April 2021. Results: Compared with baseline, scores significantly decreased after 3 and 6 months of treatment in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total (from 28.9 to 17.7 and 12.0), and global functional impairment of the Sheehan Disability Inventory (from 26.3 to 19.1 and 16.7). The number of correct answers in the symbol digit modalities test significantly improved during vortioxetine treatment (from 40.4 to 43.8 and 48.4). Regarding the clinical global impression scale, the score for disease severity significantly decreased from 3.8 to 3.0 and 2.4. Compared with baseline, there was a significant reduction in consumption of practically all substances, especially of alcohol, cannabis, and cocaine. Conclusion: Vortioxetine was effective in clinical practice for alleviating depressive symptoms and functional impairment, and in improving cognitive and executive functions and disease severity in patients with MDD and SUD. Moreover, the treatment with vortioxetine favored a reduction in substance use and the severity of the SUDs.

Results of a Hepatitis C Micro-Elimination Program in Two Addiction Centers Among Subjects With Substance Use Disorder.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate a hepatitis C (HCV) micro-elimination program in 2 addiction centers among subjects with substance use disorders (SUD). METHODS: The program was based on simplifying the diagnosis of HCV infections by avoiding referral to primary care for the diagnosis and performing the necessary tests at the point of care (ie, the addition center) and simplifying the patient pathway by directly referring patients to the specialized care for treatment. Descriptive and multivariate analyses are presented. RESULTS: Of the 1497 subjects included in the program, 327 reported that they were anti-HCV-positive. Among the 1170 patients who were offered the HCV rapid antibody test, 180 (15.4%) did not perform the test. Performing the HCV rapid antibody test only contributed ten patients (3%) to the 337 who were anti-HCV-positive. A high proportion (147 out of 327 [45%]) of subjects who reported being anti-HCV-positive also reported that they had not been treated for HCV. Among the 67 subjects who were HCV-RNA-positive and were referred for treatment, 53 (79%) ultimately received and completed antiviral treatment. Unfortunately, we did not find any factors associated with not performing dry blood testing, and the factors associated with not performing the HCV rapid antibody test were difficult to interpret, and the model showed low goodness of fit. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a micro-elimination program focused on patients with SUD attending an addiction center is not effective for screening the presence of hepatitis C but is successful for linking patients with hepatitis C to antiviral treatment.

Developing an App to Screen for Dual Disorders: A Tool for Improving Treatment Services in Mexico.

Background: Previous studies in Mexico undertaken at residential facilities for treating substance use disorders (SUDs) reported that the prevalence of Dual Disorders (DDs) is over 65%. DDs pose a major challenge for the Mexican health system, particularly for community-based residential care facilities for SUDs, due to the shortage of certified professionals to diagnose and treat these patients. Moreover, the lack of standardized algorithms for screening for and evaluating DDs to refer patients to specialized services (whether private or public) hinders timely care, delaying the start of integrated treatment. The use of new technologies provides a strategic opportunity for the timely detection of DDs through the development of standardized digital applications for the timely detection of DDs. Objective: To develop an app to screen for DDs, which will contribute to referral to specialized services in keeping with the level of severity of psychiatric and addictive symptomatology, and be suitable for use by community-based residential care facilities for SUDs. Method: The research project was implemented in two stages. Stage 1 involved obtaining the psychometric properties of the Dual Diagnosis Screening Interview (DDSI). Stage 2 consisted of two steps to test the Beta version of the app and the quality of version 1.0. Results: The DDS obtained sensitivity and specificity scores above 85%. The app and its algorithm to screen for and refer DDs proved to be efficient and easy to apply with satisfactory community acceptance. Conclusion: The app promises to be a useful screening tool at residential addiction treatment centers.

Effectiveness of tianeptine in patients with major depressive disorder and substance use disorder.

The depressive disorder coexists in a high prevalence with a substance-related disorder, which is asso- ciated with a worst prognosis. The therapeutic interventions for this co-morbidity lack of the appropriate scientific sup- port. The existing evidence suggest that the currently avail- able anti-depressive drugs are of minor efficacy in this group of patients. An alternative would be the use of different drugs with distinctive neurobiological mechanism of action. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical develop- ment of a series of patients affected by this comorbidity un- der treatment with tianeptine under usual clinical practices.

Efectividad de tianeptina en pacientescon depresión mayor y trastorno poruso de sustancias / Effectiveness of tianeptine in patients with major depressive disorder and substance use disorder

Introducción: La depresión coexiste frecuentemente conlos trastornos por uso de sustancias (TUS), lo que conllevaun peor pronóstico. Existe una importante falta de evidenciasobre las intervenciones terapéuticas más efectivas para estacomorbilidad. Los estudios existentes sugieren que los antidepresivos disponibles actualmente son poco eficaces paraestos pacientes. La disponibilidad terapéutica de antidepresivos con mecanismos neurobiológicos diferentes podría seruna alternativa. El objetivo es describir la evolución de ungrupo de pacientes con esta comorbilidad que han realizadotratamiento con tianeptina en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual en consultas de deshabituación.Metodología. Se diseñó un estudio postautorización,multicéntrico, retrospectivo y observacional de práctica clínica habitual. Se revisaron las historias clínicas de los 100últimos pacientes diagnosticados de depresión mayor y TUS,tratados con tianeptina durante al menos 3 meses. Se evaluaron en tres ocasiones (inicial, intermedia y final a los 3meses) las siguientes escalas: Escala de Evaluación para laDepresión de Hamilton (HDRS), Escala de Impresión ClínicaGlobal (ICG) y Escala de Gravedad de la Adicción (SDS).Resultados. La mayoría de los pacientes fueron tratadoscon una combinación de psicofármacos y psicoterapia. Alfinal del seguimiento 70 pacientes (70 %) obtuvieron unaremisión clínica según la escala HDRS y 76 pacientes (76 %)se clasificaron con mucha o moderada mejoría según ICG.Respecto al consumo, los descensos más destacados se produjeron en los trastornos por uso de alcohol y cocaína.Conclusión. Tianeptina, en monoterapia o en combinación, puede ser un tratamiento de utilidad para pacientescon depresión dual de forma conjunta con otras medidasterapéuticas que traten de forma integrada estos pacientescomplejos. (AU)

Introduction: The depressive disorder coexists in a highprevalence with a substance-related disorder, which is associated with a worst prognosis. The therapeutic interventions for this co-morbidity lack of the appropriate scientificsupport. The existing evidence suggest that the currentlyavailable anti-depressive drugs are of minor efficacy in thisgroup of patients. An alternative would be the use of different drugs with distinctive neurobiological mechanismof action. The aim of this study was to describe the clinicaldevelopment of a series of patients affected by this comorbidity under treatment with tianeptine under usual clinicalpractices.Methods. Study design corresponds to a post-authorization, observational, retrospective, multicentric, study underusual clinical practice study. The clinical history of the lastconsecutive 100 patients diagnosed of major depressive andsubstance-related disorders under treatment with tianeptinefor at least 3 months was reviewed. The following scales wereevaluated in 3 times (basal, intermediate, final): HDRS, ICGand SDS. Results. Most patients were treated by a combinationof anti-depressive drugs together with psychotherapy. Atthe end of follow-up, 70 % patients had a clinical remissionin accordance with HDRS and 76 % of them had a mild orsignificant improvement in ICG. Regarding the use of substances, the most remarkable decreases were obtained in theconsumption of alcohol, and cocaine.Conclusion. Tianeptine could be a useful drug for thetreatment of patients with dual diagnosis of depression andsubstance-related disorder, together with other therapeuticinterventions. (AU)

Treatment Needs and Service Delivery for Patients with Dual Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings From the WADD Survey.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a great challenge for the existing health systems. The restrictions imposed across countries on the movement of people and the realignment of health care services in response to the pandemic are likely to negatively affect the health status and delivery of mental health services to persons with dual disorders (PWDD). Methods: An online survey was conducted among mental health professionals involved in providing care to PWDD to better understand the problems encountered and identify potential solutions in providing continued treatment for PWDD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: The findings confirmed significant disruption in the delivery of treatment services for PWDD during the COVID-19 pandemic. Dissatisfaction with personal protective equipment, inadequate COVID-19 testing services at treatment facility, and lack of guidelines on providing continued treatment services to PWDD by national authorities or professional bodies were identified as the likely reasons for this disruption. Conclusions: These concerns in turn need to be addressed by the policy-makers, hospital management staff, and other stakeholders. Specifically, there should be a focus on developing and disseminating guidelines to assist mental health professionals in setting-up and providing continued treatment services to PWDD via tele-psychiatry and other novel digital strategies.

Characterization of dual disorders in addiction treatment-seekers at mexican outpatient centers.

In Mexico, very few studies have been published on dual disorders (DD) at specialized treatment centers describing actual treatment needs and even fewer have been undertaken at addiction treatment centers in the public system. The objective of this study was therefore to analyze DD and other clinical characteristics in people seeking treatment at outpatient addiction centers in the public system.

Caracterización de la patología dual en personas que buscan tratamiento de adicciones en centros ambulatorios mexicanos / Characterization of dual disorders in addiction treatment-seekers at mexican outpatient centers

INTRODUCCIÓN: En México son pocos los estudios publicados sobre la patología dual (PD) en centros de tratamiento espe­cializados que describan las necesidades reales de tratamiento y menos aún que se hayan realizado en centros de tratamiento de adicciones del sistema público. Por esto, el objetivo de pre­sente estudio fue analizar la PD y otras características clínicas en personas que buscan tratamiento en centros ambulatorios de adicciones del sistema público. MÉTODO: Estudio transversal multisede. Se analizó una muestra de 148 pacientes de cen­tros de tratamiento. Se evaluaron trastornos psiquiátricos con la Mini Entrevista Neuropsiquiátrica Internacional, conductas sexuales de riesgo con la Escala de Comportamiento de Riesgo de VIH, consumo de drogas inyectables, y la calidad de vida con el Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida. Se realizaron análisis univariados mediante chi cuadrado para determinar diferen­cias estadísticas entre personas con y sin PD, así como regre­sión lineal para calidad de vida y regresión logística binomial para determinar el riesgo para presentar consumo de drogas inyectables, uso de condón y conducta suicida. RESULTADOS: La cocaína fue la droga de impacto con mayor prevalencia (33.8%). El grupo de personas con trastorno por consumo de alcohol + trastorno por consumo de drogas presentó mayor comorbilidad con el trastorno depresivo mayor (25.7%), tras­torno antisocial (27.7%), déficit de atención (11.5%) e intento suicida (17.6%). El grupo con PD presentó mayor consumo de drogas inyectables (OR= 1.67), no uso de condón con pareja primaria (OR= 3.66), más intentos de suicidio (OR= 4.2) y una menor calidad de vida en comparación con aquellos sin PD. CONCLUSIÓN: Caracterizar a los pacientes con PD, permite iden­tificar con precisión sus necesidades de tratamiento y desarro­llar programas de mejora continua para optimizar los recursos y mejorar el éxito de la atención

INTRODUCTION: In Mexico, very few studies have been published on dual disorders (DD) at specialized treatment centers describing actual treatment needs and even few­er have been undertaken at addiction treatment centers in the public system. The objective of this study was therefore to analyze DD and other clinical characteristics in people seeking treatment at outpatient addiction centers in the public system. Method. Cross-sectional multi-site study. A sample of 148 patients from treatment centers was analyzed. Psychi­atric disorders were evaluated with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, risky sexual behaviors with the HIV Risk Behavior Scale, injection drug use, and quality of life with the Quality of Life Questionnaire. Univariate chi-square analyses were performed to determine statistical dif­ferences between subjects with and without DD, while linear regression was used to calculate quality of life and binomial logistic regression to determine the risk of injection drug use, condom use, and suicidal behavior. RESULTS: Cocaine was the impact drug with the highest prevalence (33.8%). The group of subjects with alcohol use disorder + drug use disorder presented greater comorbidi­ty with major depressive disorder (25.7%), antisocial disor­der (27.7%), attention deficit (11.5%) and suicide attempt (17.6%). The group with DD presented higher injection drug use (OR = 1.67), non-use of condoms with a primary part­ner (OR = 3.66), more suicide attempts (OR = 4.2) and lower quality of life than those without DD. CONCLUSION: Characterizing patients with DD enables the accurate identification of their treatment needs and the development of continuous improvement programs to opti­mize resources and improve the success of care

Partial Agonists and Dual Disorders: Focus on Dual Schizophrenia.

Dual disorder is a term applied to patients with an addictive disorder and other mental disorder. Epidemiological studies have established that dual disorders are an expectation rather than an exception. They are difficult to diagnose and treat and constitute a huge burden for both patients and their relatives and society. Current treatments are a combination of those needed to treat the addictive disorder with those focused on the co-occurring psychiatric disorder. Focusing specifically on schizophrenia, growing scientific evidence supports the existence of a shared vulnerability for substance use in these patients and those at risk. Various antipsychotics have been found to be useful in the treatment of psychotic symptoms and disorders; however, few effective treatments have been identified until now for substance use disorders in patients with dual schizophrenia. Partial agonism stands as a new pharmacological option available in recent years. Molecules with this kind of action may act as functional agonists or as antagonists, depending on the surrounding levels of the neurotransmitter. Studies have found their efficacy in schizophrenia, addiction, anxiety and depression. Certain partial agonist antipsychotics seem to have a role in the treatment of dual schizophrenia. That could be the case with cariprazine. Because of its higher affinity for dopaminergic D3 receptors compared to D2, a potential to prevent relapse to addiction, added to its antipsychotic efficacy, has been suggested. Here we briefly review current advances and future directions and introduce some personal insights into the role of partial agonists in co-occurring schizophrenia and substance use.

Study to determine relevant health outcome measures in opioid use disorder: Multicriteria decision analysis. / Estudio para la determinación de medidas de resultados en salud relevantes en el trastorno por consumo de opiáceos. Análisis de decisión multicriterio.

The aim of the current study was to establish the most relevant health outcomes to assess opioid substitution treatment programmes (OSP) in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) in Spain. A multicriteria decision analysis was applied in 3 phases: 1) concepts and criteria definitions; 2) criteria screening and weighting by means of a discrete choice experiment; 3) deliberative process. Criteria established in phase 1 were: substance use (opioids, alcohol, tobacco, stimulants and cannabis), other mental disorders (affective/anxiety disorder, psychosis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, gambling disorder and other impulse control disorders), level of disability, adherence, medical illnesses (medical comorbidities, risk behaviours, infectious and sexually transmitted diseases), psychosocial aspects (hostile and/or violent behaviour and work problems), functional disability (quality of life, treatment and service satisfaction, social functionality). In phase 2, the most relevant factors in OSP were determined, and subsequently assessed in the deliberative process: remission of substance use (opioids, alcohol and stimulants), improvement of other mental disorders (psychosis and borderline personality disorder), improvement in comorbidity management, and improvement in social functionality, with a weighting of 56.5%, 21.9%, 11.0%, and 10.7%, respectively. The current analysis defines the main health outcomes in OSP in patients with OUD in Spain, supporting decision making and socio-health management of existing resources.

El objetivo fue establecer los resultados en salud con mayor relevancia en la evaluación de programas de tratamiento de sustitución de opiáceos (PTSO) en pacientes con trastorno por consumo de opiáceos (TCO) en España. Se realizó un análisis de decisión multicriterio con 3 fases: 1) definición de conceptos y criterios a evaluar; 2) cribado y ponderación de criterios mediante un experimento de elecciones discretas; 3) proceso deliberativo. Los criterios de la fase 1 fueron: consumo de sustancias (opiáceos, alcohol, tabaco, estimulantes y cannabis), trastornos mentales (trastorno afectivo ansioso, psicosis, trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad, trastorno límite de personalidad, trastornos de personalidad antisocial, trastorno por juego y otras alteraciones del control de los impulsos), nivel de discapacidad, adherencia, enfermedades médicas (comorbilidades, conductas de riesgo, enfermedades infecciosas y de transmisión sexual), aspectos psicosociales (conducta hostil y/o violenta, presencia de problemas laborales), discapacidad funcional (calidad de vida, satisfacción con el tratamiento y servicio, funcionamiento social). En la fase 2 se determinaron los factores fundamentales en la elección de un PTSO, revisados en el proceso deliberativo: remisión del consumo de sustancias (opiáceos, alcohol y estimulantes), mejoría en el manejo de otros trastornos mentales (psicosis y trastorno límite de la personalidad), mejoría en manejo de comorbilidades médicas y mejoría en el funcionamiento social, con un peso del 56,5%, 21,9%, 11,0% 10,7% respectivamente. Este análisis define los resultados sanitarios más relevantes en PTSO en pacientes con TCO en España, favoreciendo la toma de decisiones y la gestión socio-sanitaria de los recursos existentes.

Estudio para la determinación de medidas de resultados en salud relevantes en el trastorno por consumo de opiáceos. Análisis de decisión multicriterio / Study to determine relevant health outcome measures in opioid use disorder: Multicriteria decision análisis

El objetivo fue establecer los resultados en salud con mayor relevancia en la evaluación de programas de tratamiento de sustitución de opiáceos (PTSO) en pacientes con trastorno por consumo de opiáceos (TCO) en España. Se realizó un análisis de decisión multicriterio con 3 fases: 1) definición de conceptos y criterios a evaluar; 2) cribado y ponderación de criterios mediante un experimento de elecciones discretas; 3) proceso deliberativo. Los criterios de la fase 1 fueron: consumo de sustancias (opiáceos, alcohol, tabaco, estimulantes y cannabis), trastornos mentales (trastorno afectivo ansioso, psicosis, trastorno por déficit de atención e hiperactividad, trastorno límite de personalidad, trastornos de personalidad antisocial, trastorno por juego y otras alteraciones del control de los impulsos), nivel de discapacidad, adherencia, enfermedades médicas (comorbilidades, conductas de riesgo, enfermedades infecciosas y de transmisión sexual), aspectos psicosociales (conducta hostil y/o violenta, presencia de problemas laborales), discapacidad funcional (calidad de vida, satisfacción con el tratamiento y servicio, funcionamiento social). En la fase 2 se determinaron los factores fundamentales en la elección de un PTSO, revisados en el proceso deliberativo: remisión del consumo de sustancias (opiáceos, alcohol y estimulantes), mejoría en el manejo de otros trastornos mentales (psicosis y trastorno límite de la personalidad), mejoría en manejo de comorbilidades médicas y mejoría en el funcionamiento social, con un peso del 56,5%, 21,9%, 11,0% 10,7% respectivamente. Este análisis define los resultados sanitarios más relevantes en PTSO en pacientes con TCO en España, favoreciendo la toma de decisiones y la gestión socio-sanitaria de los recursos existentes

The aim of the current study was to establish the most relevant health outcomes to assess opioid substitution treatment programmes (OSP) in patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) in Spain. A multicriteria decision analysis was applied in 3 phases: 1) concepts and criteria definitions; 2) criteria screening and weighting by means of a discrete choice experiment; 3) deliberative process. Criteria established in phase 1 were: substance use (opioids, alcohol, tobacco, stimulants and cannabis), other mental disorders (affective/anxiety disorder, psychosis, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, borderline personality disorder, antisocial personality disorder, gambling disorder and other impulse control disorders), level of disability, adherence, medical illnesses (medical comorbidities, risk behaviours, infectious and sexually transmitted diseases), psychosocial aspects (hostile and/ or violent behaviour and work problems), functional disability (quality of life, treatment and service satisfaction, social functionality). In phase 2, the most relevant factors in OSP were determined, and subsequently assessed in the deliberative process: remission of substance use (opioids, alcohol and stimulants), improvement of other mental disorders (psychosis and borderline personality disorder), improvement in comorbidity management, and improvement in social functionality, with a weighting of 56.5%, 21.9%, 11.0%, and 10.7%, respectively. The current analysis defines the main health outcomes in OSP in patients with OUD in Spain, supporting decision making and socio-health management of existing resources

Gambling Dual Disorder: A Dual Disorder and Clinical Neuroscience Perspective.

Several behaviors, including compulsive gambling, have been considered non-substance-related addictive disorders. Categorical mental disorders (e.g., DSM-5) are usually accompanied by very different symptomatic expressions (affective, behavioral, cognitive, substance abuse, personality traits). When these mental disorders occur with addictive disorders, either concomitantly or sequentially over the life span, this clinical condition is called a dual disorder. Gambling disorder (GD) has been associated with other categorical psychiatric diagnoses: attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, bipolar disorder, social anxiety, schizophrenia, substance use disorder, antisocial personality disorder; and dimensional symptoms including higher impulsivity, poorer emotional wellbeing, cognitive distortion, psychosis, deficient self-regulation, suicide, poorer family environment, and greater mental distress. We are calling this clinical condition Gambling Dual Disorder. From a clinical perspective, it is clear that Gambling Dual Disorder is not the exception but rather the expectation, and this holds true not just for GD, but also for other mental disorders including other addictions. Mental disorders are viewed as biological disorders that involve brain circuits that implicate specific domains of cognition, emotion, and behavior. This narrative review presents the state of the art with respect to GD in order to address current matters from a dual disorder, precision psychiatry, and clinical neuroscience perspective, rather than the more subjective approach of symptomatology and clinical presentation. This review also presents Gambling Dual Disorder as a brain and neurodevelopmental disorder, including from the perspectives of evolutionary psychiatry, genetics, impulsivity as an endophenotype, the self-medication hypothesis, and sexual biological differences. The wide vision of the disease advances a paradigm shift, highlighting how GD and dual disorders should be conceptualized, diagnosed, and treated. Rethinking GD as part of a dual disorder is crucial for its appropriate conceptualization from the perspective of clinical neuroscience and precision psychiatry.

Professional perception of clozapine use in patients with dual psychosis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with psychotic disorders often have substance use disorders and other addictions. The objective of this study was to know the current treatment situation of these patients focusing on clozapine, which was proposed in most consensus as antipsychotic of first choice in this indication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey with 14 questions on aspects related to the treatment and management of the dual disorders was developed, emphasizing the role of clozapine in this disease. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 199 experts in mental illnesses (90.5% physicians and 9.5% psychologists). A total of 88.4% of experts were able to prescribe clozapine, but the majority (89.4%) administered the drug to patients with resistant schizophrenia without considering a dual disorder. Only 30.8% considered the use of clozapine in patients with dual psychosis. The underutilization of clozapine in these patients was mainly attributed to controls of the pharmacovigilance plan, including frequent leukocyte count (57.1%), and lack of drug education (35.6%). The main measures proposed to increase its use are fewer blood tests (29.3%), more training (27.8%), and fewer administrative problems (25.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In order to improve the treatment of patients with dual psychosis, it is necessary to simplify the therapy and increase the training of professionals in the use of atypical antipsychotics, especially clozapine, designed to be the drug of choice in the main expert consensus.

Percepción de los profesionales sobre el uso de la clozapina en pacientes con psicosis dual / Professional perception of clozapine use in patients with dual psychosis

INTRODUCCIÓN. Los pacientes con trastornos psicóticos presentan con frecuencia trastornos por uso de sustancias y otras adicciones. El objetivo de este estudio fue conocer la situación actual del tratamiento de estos pacientes con el foco puesto en la clozapina, que ha sido propuesta en la mayoría de los consensos como antipsicótico de primera elección en esta indicación. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS. Se elaboró una encuesta con 14 preguntas sobre aspectos relacionados con el tratamiento y manejo de la patología dual, haciendo hincapié en el papel de la clozapina en esta enfermedad. RESULTADOS: La encuesta fue respondida por 199 exper-tos en enfermedades mentales (90,5% médicos y 9,5% psicólogos). Un 88,4% de los encuestados tenía posibilidad de prescribir la clozapina, pero la mayoría (89,4%) la administraba a pacientes con esquizofrenia resistente sin considerar una patología dual. Solo un 30,8% planteó el uso de la clozapina a pacientes con psicosis dual. La infrautilización de la clozapina en estos pacientes se atribuyó principalmente a los controles del plan de farmacovigilancia, incluido el recuento leucocitario frecuente (57,1%), y a la falta de formación sobre el fármaco (35,6%). Las principales medidas propuestas para incrementar su uso son tener que hacer menos controles hemáticos (29,3%), mayor formación (27,8%) y tener menos problemas administrativos (25,1%). CONCLUSIONES: Para mejorar el tratamiento de los pacientes con psicosis dual es necesario simplificar la terapia e incrementar la formación de los profesionales sobre el uso de antipsicóticos atípicos, especialmente la clozapina, considerada como el fármaco de elección en los principales consensos de expertos

INTRODUCTION: Patients with psychotic disorders often have substance use disorders and other addictions. The objective of this study was to know the current treatment situation of these patients focusing on clozapine, which was proposed in most consensus as antipsychotic of first choice in this indication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A survey with 14 questions on aspects related to the treatment and management of the dual disorders was developed, emphasizing the role of clozapine in this disease. RESULTS: The survey was answered by 199 experts in mental illnesses (90.5% physicians and 9.5% psychologists). A total of 88.4% of experts were able to prescribe clozapine, but the majority (89.4%) administered the drug to patients with resistant schizophrenia without considering a dual dis-order. Only 30.8% considered the use of clozapine in patients with dual psychosis. The underutilization of clozapine in these patients was mainly attributed to controls of the pharmacovigilance plan, including frequent leukocyte count (57.1%), and lack of drug education (35.6%). The main measures proposed to increase its use are fewer blood tests (29.3%), more training (27.8%), and fewer administrative problems (25.1%). CONCLUSIONS: In order to improve the treatment of patients with dual psychosis, it is necessary to simplify the therapy and increase the training of professionals in the use of atypical antipsychotics, especially clozapine, designed to be the drug of choice in the main expert consensus

Correction to: Once­Monthly Long­Acting Injectable Aripiprazole for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia and Co­occurring Substance Use Disorders: A Multicentre, Observational Study.

A randomized, 1-year follow-up study comparing LAI aripiprazole with LAI paliperidone in patients with psychosis, mostly schizophrenia, and SUD reported a large effect of the change from baseline in the CGI severity score, from 5.9 to 2.4 for LAI aripiprazole and from 5.7 to 2.6 for LAI risperidone [29].

Once-Monthly Long-Acting Injectable Aripiprazole for the Treatment of Patients with Schizophrenia and Co-occurring Substance Use Disorders: A Multicentre, Observational Study.

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and impact of long-acting injectable (LAI) aripiprazole in patients with schizophrenia with a coexisting substance use disorder (SUD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter, observational, descriptive and retrospective study was conducted in patients with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia who had a coexisting SUD and were treated with LAI-aripiprazole. Disease severity was evaluated with the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) severity scale for schizophrenia, daily functioning and disability were evaluated with the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Scale (WHODAS-2.0), and the severity of the addiction was evaluated with the Severity of Dependence Scale (SDS). RESULTS: The sample included 40 patients. Overall, after 6 months of treatment with LAI-aripiprazole at a dose of 400 mg/4 weeks in 77.5% of the patients, we observed significant improvement in the psychopathological symptoms, with a reduction of over 30% in the scores of the five CGI-severity scales. The WHODAS-2.0 mean (standard deviation) score was also significantly reduced from 57.6 (8.2) to 42.3 (4.3) points (p < 0.001). Regarding SUDs, after 6 months of treatment, substance use was stopped in 5 of the 9 patients with cocaine use disorder and in 3 of the 16 patients with alcohol abuse disorder. A significant reduction in the severity of the dependence was observed only in the subgroups of participants with cocaine and alcohol use disorders. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that once-monthly LAI-aripiprazole retains its antipsychotic efficacy in patients with schizophrenia and a coexisting SUD and could be useful for the management of cocaine or alcohol use disorders in this population.

Coexistence between personality disorders and substance use disorder. Madrid study about prevalence of dual pathology.

INTRODUCTION: Personality disorders (PD) and substance use disorders (SUD) have a high prevalence and an important health and socioeconomic impact so, it is interesting to study the relationship between them. The objectives of the study are: to compare the prevalence of SUD between patients with and without diagnosis of PD, to analyze if any PD is related to the SUD, and if a specific PD is associated with a specific SUD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cross-sectional study in 837 patients from centers of attention to drug addiction and mental health in Madrid, Spain. The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) and the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4+ (PDQ4+) are used to detect mental disorder and PD, respectively. RESULTS: SUD is significantly higher in antisocial PD (p<0.01); sedative (p<0.01) and alcohol (p<0.05) use disorder in borderline PD; cocaine (p<0.05) and alcohol (p<0.01) use disorder in paranoid PD; and alcohol use disorder in histrionic PD (p<0.01). The SUD for cocaine is lower in obsessive- compulsive PD (p<0.05) and depressive PD (p<0.01). There is a positive correlation between the number of PD of a subject and the number of SUD that it presents. The risk of an alcohol [OR of 1,08 CI (1,01-1,16)] or sedatives [OR of 1,08 CI (1,001-1,17)] use disorders increases if an individual presents more than one type of PD. CONCLUSIONS: There is not differences of SUD prevalence between PD and not PD groups. We found an association between SUD and PD of cluster B (antisocial, borderline and histrionic) and also with paranoid PD. The SUD are more common among man with the exception of sedatives.

Análisis de decisión multicriterio en programas de tratamiento de sustitución de opiáceos en trastornos por consumo de opiáceos. / Análisis de decisión multicriterio en programas de tratamiento de sustitución de opiáceos en trastornos por consumo de opiáceos.

Editorial.

Editorial.